From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4464 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Edward J. Sabol" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Frame Configuration (was Re: Things that I'm removing...) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 15:44:06 -0500 Message-ID: <199512152044.PAA27674@thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145208 29687 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:20:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA03082 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:18:52 -0800 Original-Received: from thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov (thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.127.167]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 21:44:07 +0100 Original-Received: (from sabol@localhost) by thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov (LHEA9504/950407.s1) id PAA27674; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 15:44:06 -0500 Original-To: Gnus Mailing List In-reply-to: (larsi@ifi.uio.no) Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4464 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4464 Excerpts from mail: (15-Dec-95) Re: Things that I'm removing from the todo list by Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > The new recursive window config thing is really neat. Just finding > the right structure for data is *so* important. I still don't > remember who came up with this structure, but it seems very usable. I > did a complex test -- I envisioned something that would look like: > > -------------------------------- > | | | | > | | | | > | |------------------------- > | | | | > ------| | | > | | | | > | | | | > -------------------------------- > > And it came out right (almost) on the first try. > > Recursive structures *rule*. :-) Unfortunately, they are confusing. I've read and studied the documentation you wrote for these structures, and I still can't figure it out. Maybe I don't understand your notation. Either way, could you post the value of gnus-frame-configuration that you used in the above test example? I think I can get a better feel for it with an actual working example. Thanks, Ed