From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4495 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sgnus PGP signature hiding stuff works too well Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 14:42:17 -0500 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Message-ID: <199512181942.OAA17636@delphi.ccs.neu.edu> References: <199512171626.IAA13530@edmonds.home.cs.ubc.ca> <199512181840.NAA28921@thuban.gsfc.nasa.gov> <199512181922.UAA09722@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145235 29815 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:20:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA19635 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 12:35:44 -0800 Original-Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu (root@amber.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.111.100]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 20:42:19 +0100 Original-Received: from delphi.ccs.neu.edu (ratinox@delphi.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.112.101]) by amber.ccs.neu.edu (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id OAA28030 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 14:42:17 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (ratinox@localhost) by delphi.ccs.neu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.4) id OAA17636; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 14:42:17 -0500 Original-To: "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" In-reply-to: Per Abrahamsen's message of Mon, 18 Dec 1995 20:22:20 +0100 X-NSA-Fodder: Panama PLO jihad counter-intelligence Croatian X-Attribution: Rat Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4495 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4495 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "PA" == Per Abrahamsen writes: PA> PGP: {none,unchecked,checked,failed} DS: { unchecked | valid | invalid } "DS" for "digital signature". PGP isn't the only way to sign messages, even if it is the most commonly used. And "none" is denoted by the lack of the header -- no need to waste space for something that, for a lot of messages, is going to be nil anyway. And there really should be some means of text-only feedback on this. If this is important enough to actually integrate (I think so) then it should be easilly visible on monochromatic displays. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface iQCVAwUBMNXEEJ6VRH7BJMxHAQEwvwP8CF6UrWrlXmhafGCbBLMd0YijER8Wj6Di VAohWWHrRTW/bf0vXx2OmXLiWeOrQE8uAntVLrxVbeVAUhFGmVDMOTH3wJTzKTLK +c/PyOLL5V273aPYw9WUj53FIJ/YJqll2/WxynWnJErz1VaSnBjUAhdgexIsEr9W TawOvMacfb0= =dJuH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Rat \ Do not use Happy Fun Ball on concrete. PGP Public Key: Ask for one today! \ http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ratinox/ \