From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4629 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Alternate realities Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 19:52:59 +0100 Message-ID: <199601101852.TAA11448@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145351 30313 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:22:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA31652 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 11:43:49 -0800 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 19:54:20 +0100 Original-Received: from ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (ssv4.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.223]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id TAA00440; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 19:50:26 +0100 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id TAA11448; Wed, 10 Jan 1996 19:52:59 +0100 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 09 Jan 1996 19:44:01 +0100 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4629 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4629 >>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: LMI> The first is an (I think) tin thingie -- you first pick the articles LMI> you want to read, and then you start reading. I'm pretty sure this was pioneered by Kim Storm and his NN newsreader. LMI> Then you press `RET', the LMI> summary buffer disappears (after being limited to the articles you've LMI> chosen) and you do all reading from the article buffer. I think I'd prefer to stay in the summary buffer. One way to do that might be to make the `next-unread' commands always prefer articles with a process mark over unmarked articles. LMI> I was wondering whether I should add a minor mode the people can use LMI> in mail groups... but I'm not sure. Maybe if you told us what the mode should do? LMI> In fact, I'm not sure whether LMI> adding minor modes to the summary buffers is a good idea at all. LMI> Isn't changing keymaps around on the user a bit naughty? Even if the LMI> user has requested it by switching the minor mode on? Not if you use `minor-mode-map-alist'. The user can always redefine the keymap then. LMI> File name translation (":" -> "_") now works everywhere. Emacs 19.31 will have a `convert-standard-filename' function. If you use that instead (and provide a dummy when absent) you won't have to change anything for future Emacs ports.