From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4668 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Per Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Alternate realities Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 18:37:55 +0100 Message-ID: <199601131737.SAA18000@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> References: <199601101852.TAA11448@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145385 30447 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:23:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA08573 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 10:05:11 -0800 Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 18:39:18 +0100 Original-Received: from ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (ssv4.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.223]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id SAA08769; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 18:35:18 +0100 Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id SAA18000; Sat, 13 Jan 1996 18:37:55 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-reply-to: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 11 Jan 1996 22:34:51 +0100 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4668 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4668 >>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: LMI> The problem with using the process marks for that is that it would LMI> make it more difficult to execute commands that normally react to the LMI> process mark -- like saving articles, for instance. One possible way around that would be that: 1) When you press `RET' to leave pick mode, all process marks get converted to another secondary mark (e.g. `I' for interesting). 2) Make `next-unread' prefer interesting articles. LMI> I've now added a variable to control whether the summary buffer should LMI> disappear when you start reading the articles. The summary buffer LMI> will be limited to the process-marked ("picked") articles first, LMI> though. How about making a numeric value for that variable mean: Add this number to the picked articles scores. Then people who like to see the full summary can use e.g. `V m' or `,' to move among the picked messages. LMI> Making Gnus more "mail-readerly", sort of. But I don't LMI> really like the idea, so I'm trying to be as unconvincing as LMI> possible. :-) I'm firmly unconvinced! LMI> Great! I've really missed a function like that. Will it be run on LMI> all files automatically, or is it something I'll have to call LMI> explicitly? Explicitly. I guess if the user ask it to write a file to `LP1:', Emacs shouldn't implicitly convert the name to `LP1_'.