Re: Article hiding functions -- toggles or not

Re: Article hiding functions -- toggles or not

[srivasta]

hi,

	Personally, I would vote for a toggle (save wear on my pinkie)
	
	manoj
--
"Some would sooner die than think.  In fact, they often do."  --
Bertrand Russell %%
Manoj Srivastava               Systems Research Programmer, Project Pilgrim,
Phone: (413) 545-3918                A143B Lederle Graduate Research Center,
Fax:   (413) 545-1249         University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
<srivasta@pilgrim.umass.edu> <URL:http://www.pilgrim.umass.edu/%7Esrivasta/>

Re: Article hiding functions -- toggles or not

[Robert Pluim]

>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

    Lars> All the article hiding functions (the ones under `W W-')
    Lars> currently unhide when given a prefix and hide when you don't
    Lars> give them a prefix.  It has been suggested that the
    Lars> functions should toggle hiding instead -- `W W s' would
    Lars> toggle whether to hide the signature, `C-u -1 W W s' would
    Lars> unhide the signature, and `C-u 1 W W s' would hide the
    Lars> signature.

    Lars> So this is a poll: Should the hiding functions be toggles or
    Lars> not?

Hmm, if that means I can do W W s to unhide, followed by W W s to hide
again, then I vote yes. If that means that W W s only takes effect
when the next article is displayed, then the answer is no.

Robert

Re: Article hiding functions -- toggles or not

[d. hall]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 234 bytes --]

ð thus on 11 Jan 1996 22:01:46 +0100, Lars virtually scripted...

Lars> So this is a poll: Should the hiding functions be toggles or not?

emphatic, YES! =)

d.
--
<<This is where you fall down.>>
				~ from mortal kombat, the movie

Re: Article hiding functions -- toggles or not

[Steven L Baur]

>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

Lars> So this is a poll:  Should the hiding functions be toggles or not?

Yes.  And it would be nice to make them persistent like M-t is.  I
know you can always M-ESC (setq ...), but that's not very
convenient most of the time.

-- 
steve@miranova.com baur

Re: Article hiding functions -- toggles or not

[Roger Williams]

>>>>> "Red Leaf" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:

  > So this is a poll: Should the hiding functions be toggles or not?

No.

-- 
Roger Williams            PGP key available from PGP public keyservers
Coelacanth Engineering        consulting & turnkey product development
Middleborough, MA           wireless * DSP-based instrumentation * ATE
tel +1 508 947-8049 * fax +1 508 947-9118 * http://www.coelacanth.com/

Article hiding functions -- toggles or not

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

All the article hiding functions (the ones under `W W-') currently
unhide when given a prefix and hide when you don't give them a prefix.
It has been suggested that the functions should toggle hiding instead
-- `W W s' would toggle whether to hide the signature, `C-u -1 W W s'
would unhide the signature, and `C-u 1 W W s' would hide the
signature.

So this is a poll:  Should the hiding functions be toggles or not?

-- 
   Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen * larsi@ifi.uio.no
      (a red leaf that falls from the purple tree)