From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/4812
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: (gnus-inews-domain-name); insertion of Sender:
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 09:34:14 +0100
Message-ID: <199601190834.JAA01129@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk>
References: <y3ysphdlo36.fsf@sunny.pfawww.pp.se>
	<199601181337.OAA28961@ssv4.dina.kvl.dk>
	<y3yivi9ms4r.fsf@sunny.pfawww.pp.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145507 30892 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:25:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:25:07 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: gnus-bug@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA00270 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 01:18:01 -0800
Original-Received: from elc1.dina.kvl.dk (elc1.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.228]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <JAA06690@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 09:35:42 +0100
Original-Received: from ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (ssv4.dina.kvl.dk [130.225.40.223]) by elc1.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) with ESMTP id JAA22829; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 09:31:30 +0100
Original-Received: (abraham@localhost) by ssv4.dina.kvl.dk (8.6.12/8.6.4) id JAA01129; Fri, 19 Jan 1996 09:34:14 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-reply-to: pp@pfawww.pp.se's message of 18 Jan 1996 16:36:52 +0100
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4812
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:4812

>>>>> "PP" == Per Persson <pp@pfawww.pp.se> writes:

PP> Why add a header that has the
PP> potential to be wrong if it's supposed to be authorization? 

It shows who the *software* believes the sender is, in case the *user*
by accident or deliberately uses a bogus address.  Making it easy
customizable would remove what little use it has.