From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5589 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Muelner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: gnus-format-specs Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:02:33 +0100 Message-ID: <199603191002.AA29992@fiicmal02.tu-graz.ac.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146171 796 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:36:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id DAA24812 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 03:02:29 -0800 Original-Received: from fiicmal02.tu-graz.ac.at (fiicmal02.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.153.11]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:02:43 +0100 Original-Received: by fiicmal02.tu-graz.ac.at id AA29992 (5.67b/IDA-1.5t for ding@ifi.uio.no); Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:02:33 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Face: =3YOcrzhCn8j(uU*;P>@eh}@-oWnAo71^8Y94MV~(23{bd7Cw)bsj'Bl'!1\yuMd,QuC6~p ct8M+-yv-Y<[WSb[Kp3*gg\o.&K,K+|wN6\[gwQk}SuOC*.0%xxI!I2c]M<7mNX->MSx}D #v/H Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5589 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5589 I just had a look at my .newsrc.eld and found: ... (setq gnus-format-specs '((version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") (version . "19.30.2") .... I think this expression could be optimized.