From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5961 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hallvard B Furuseth Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: SORRY (Was: Re: message-user-mail-address and other addresses) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 21:34:37 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <199604161934.VAA04884@bombur2.uio.no> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146487 1935 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:41:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA01721 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 13:42:19 -0700 Original-Received: from goggins.uio.no (6089@goggins.uio.no [129.240.201.2]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 21:34:46 +0200 Original-Received: from ulrik.uio.no by goggins.uio.no with local-SMTP (PP) id <08968-0@goggins.uio.no>; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 21:34:38 +0200 Original-Received: by bombur2.uio.no ; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 21:34:37 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5961 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5961 Sorry, skip the section below. I'm going to bed:-( I wrote: >> However, many (many) people, especially people mostly >> using XEmacs, it seems, have a `user-mail-address' that contains more >> than just the address. I don't normally think one should cater to >> brokenness, but in this instance there were just too many people that >> experienced problems. > >Hum. Well, if we are going to un-break these as far as possible -- >How do they write those addresses? Is there some "semi-standard" for >XEmacs on this? If it's > "one@address, another@address", >then > From: Joe Luser >won't work too well... >Maybe we should fix add-log & such things instead... Regards, Hallvard