From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6320
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hans de Graaff <J.J.deGraaff@TWI.TUDelft.NL>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Picons recursion bug in sgnus
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 08:31:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <199605220631.IAA02647@dutifp.twi.tudelft.nl>
Reply-To: J.J.deGraaff@TWI.TUDelft.NL (Hans de Graaff)
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146793 3285 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:46:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:46:33 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA13788 for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 22 May 1996 00:11:02 -0700
Original-Received: from duticai.twi.tudelft.nl (duticai.twi.tudelft.nl [130.161.159.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <IAA12243@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 22 May 1996 08:31:44 +0200
Original-Received: from dutifp.twi.tudelft.nl (dutifp [130.161.159.118]) by duticai.twi.tudelft.nl (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA15751 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Wed, 22 May 1996 08:31:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from graaff@localhost) by dutifp.twi.tudelft.nl (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA02647; Wed, 22 May 1996 08:31:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: ,i^c$X{l+r}VV%(bl{^[<Y3kgt`*)]&phO\8odM1n4R$1@IVjV\3J"vkO)w+s+5_VxCAdXlzTJxo'?)vSka?BQJF04Rx38XdL12h]q/e2~1OXLsVT_re
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6320
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6320

I just recently started using the picons option with XEmacs 19.13,
sgnus-0.89. I have one group with locally-generated mail, and picons
dies on this with exceeding 'max-lisp-eval-depth'. The debugger output
appended below shows what happens. I guess the culprit really is the
From: line (I've also appended the header of one of the messages
below). However, picons should be able to deal with this in a more
elegant way.

Hans

--- debugger output ---
  etc...
  gnus-picons-reverse-domain-path("Hans de Graaff <J/J/deGraaff>")
  gnus-picons-reverse-domain-path("Hans de Graaff <J/J/deGraaff>")
  gnus-picons-reverse-domain-path("Hans de Graaff <J/J/deGraaff>")
  gnus-picons-reverse-domain-path("Hans de Graaff <J/J/deGraaff>")
  gnus-picons-reverse-domain-path("Hans de Graaff <J/J/deGraaff>")
  gnus-picons-reverse-domain-path("Hans de Graaff <J/J/deGraaff>")
  gnus-picons-reverse-domain-path("Hans de Graaff <J/J/deGraaff>")
  gnus-picons-reverse-domain-path("Hans de Graaff <J/J/deGraaff>")
  gnus-picons-reverse-domain-path("Hans de Graaff <J/J/deGraaff>")
  gnus-article-display-picons()
  run-hooks(gnus-article-display-hook)
  gnus-article-prepare(261 nil)
  gnus-summary-display-article(261)
  gnus-summary-first-unread-article()
  gnus-summary-read-group("nnml:mail.system-operation" nil nil)
  gnus-group-read-group(nil nil nil)
  gnus-topic-read-group(nil)
  call-interactively(gnus-topic-read-group)

--- message header
X-From-Line: graaff@duticai.twi.tudelft.nl  Wed May 22 01:44:01 1996
Received: from dutifp.twi.tudelft.nl (dutifp [130.161.159.118]) by duticai.twi.tudelft.nl (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA09777 for <graaff@IS.TWI.TUDelft.NL>; Wed, 22 May 1996 01:44:00 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Hans de Graaff <J.J.deGraaff>
Received: (from graaff@localhost) by dutifp.twi.tudelft.nl (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA01719 for graaff; Wed, 22 May 1996 01:43:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 01:43:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199605212343.BAA01719@dutifp.twi.tudelft.nl>
To: graaff@duticai.twi.tudelft.nl
Subject: mirror update
Lines: 19
Xref: dutifp mail.system-operation:263


-- 
Hans de Graaff                              J.J.deGraaff@TWI.TUDelft.NL
Delft University of Technology        Department of Information Systems
---- <a href="http://is.twi.tudelft.nl/~graaff/">Hans de Graaff</a> ---