From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6453
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: William Perry <wmperry@monolith.spry.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: custom in 5.2
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 21:14:15 -0700
Message-ID: <199605300414.VAA00836@monolith.spry.com>
References: <w8shgsyevrk.fsf@aegir.ifi.uio.no>
Reply-To: wmperry@spry.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146906 3647 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:48:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:48:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from spork.callamer.com (root@spork.callamer.com [199.74.141.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA05229 for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 29 May 1996 21:54:39 -0700
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by spork.callamer.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA14800 for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 29 May 1996 21:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Received: from monolith.spry.com (wmperry@monolith.spry.com [198.185.2.198]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <GAA04922@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 30 May 1996 06:13:29 +0200
Original-Received: (from wmperry@localhost) by monolith.spry.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id VAA00836; Wed, 29 May 1996 21:14:15 -0700
Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Errors-to: wmperry@spry.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;
In-Reply-To: <w8shgsyevrk.fsf@aegir.ifi.uio.no>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6453
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6453

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes:
> I've now fiddled with it some, and it should now work under XEmacs
> 19.14.  Could all youse XEmacs beta testers try it and see whether it
> actually works?

  I'll give it a try tomorrow morning.

> I've also modified it to never ever use `modify-face'.  When running
> Emacs under X on an SGI Indy, initial `modify-face' calls took ~3 sec
> each.  So I've done the `make-face-bold' (etc) thing "manually".  Let
> me know whether this makes the fonts look odd or something.
> 
> And while I'm typing:  Just what is XEmacs 20.0?  In what way does it
> differ from XEmacs 19.14?

  20.0 is mainly MULE stuff, with a few other things (characters as their
own type, some byte-code changes). I think it is slated for more
'experimental' things as well - new lisp level things (lexical scope,
etc.).  I am not sure what my DLL stuff is going to go in - probably not
19.15, unless I get it pretty solid pretty quick . :)

-BIll P.