From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6490 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Brian Edmonds Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: red idea: ghettoize crossposts Date: Sun, 2 Jun 1996 07:02:40 -0700 Message-ID: <199606021402.HAA05762@edmonds.home.cs.ubc.ca> References: <199606012352.QAA27821@edmonds.home.cs.ubc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Content-Type: text X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146936 3744 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:48:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA10195 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 08:21:08 -0700 Original-Received: from grolsch.cs.ubc.ca (grolsch.cs.ubc.ca [142.103.6.9]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 17:01:14 +0200 Original-Received: from cs.ubc.ca (uucp@nnrp.cs.ubc.ca [142.103.4.2]) by grolsch.cs.ubc.ca (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id IAA23304 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 08:01:11 -0700 Original-Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cs.ubc.ca (8.6.9/8.6.9) id IAA29180 for ding@ifi.uio.no; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 08:01:05 -0700 >Received: by edmonds.home.cs.ubc.ca (Sendmail 8.7.5) id HAA05762; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 07:02:40 -0700 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-reply-to: Per Abrahamsen's message of 02 Jun 1996 02:42:24 +0200 X-Operating-System: Linux 1.99.7 #1-pre-2.0 Sat May 25 11:43:18 PDT 1996 X-Geek: http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/edmonds/doc/geek.html X-Homepage: http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/edmonds X-PGP-Ox6E86B769: This key is obsolete, please discard it. X-PGP-Ox979D0B09: A9 3E 1E CB 86 09 B1 E9 3C 1A 0E F6 49 F9 5D 99 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6490 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6490 >>>>> "Per" == Per Abrahamsen writes: BE> Thus, I would like to see a new score file primative to "kill" posts BE> crossposted to certain groups (via Xref obviously), but not actually BE> mark them as read in all other groups too, just never display them in BE> that particular group. Per> Isn't that what happens when your expunge-below is larger than your Per> mark-below? I suppose so, that hadn't occurred to me. However, could that not have bad (or at least variable) side effects when combined with adaptive scoring, and lots of other rules that are moving posts down into that range? I *want* stuff scored down there normally to get marked so it can continue to be recognized by the adaptive mechanism. Or in other words, your suggestion should work in isolation, but I don't think it will function reliably in the presence of more complicated scoring rules. Brian.