From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6779
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Is Username Expansion possible in GNUS?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:15:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <199606181715.TAA23415@durin.uio.no>
References: <x6hgs9aw5t.fsf@eyesore.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147185 4715 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:53:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:53:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA15958 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:43:35 -0700
Original-Received: from goggins.uio.no (6089@goggins.uio.no [129.240.201.2]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <TAA22547@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:15:14 +0200
Original-Received: from ulrik.uio.no by goggins.uio.no with local-SMTP (PP) 
          id <13467-0@goggins.uio.no>; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:15:11 +0200
Original-Received: by durin.uio.no ; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:15:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
In-reply-to: <x6hgs9aw5t.fsf@eyesore.no>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6779
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6779

> But shouldn't we really, really, really be adding getpwnam support to
> the Emacs/XEmacs C code?  

"We"?  No.  "They"?  Yes.  But I wouldn't hold my breath...

BTW, I wrote:             (mapcar 'match-string '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9))))))
which of course should be (mapcar 'match-string '[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9])))))
which saves *several* C operations and chunks of memory:-)


Regards,

Hallvard