From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6940 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Brian Edmonds Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Is Username Expansion possible in GNUS? Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 10:11:08 -0700 Message-ID: <199606251711.KAA25947@edmonds.home.cs.ubc.ca> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Content-Type: text X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147325 5363 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:55:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA15685 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 1996 11:17:58 -0700 Original-Received: from grolsch.cs.ubc.ca (grolsch.cs.ubc.ca [142.103.6.9]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 25 Jun 1996 19:21:35 +0200 Original-Received: from cs.ubc.ca (uucp@nnrp.cs.ubc.ca [142.103.4.2]) by grolsch.cs.ubc.ca (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA05388 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 1996 10:21:31 -0700 Original-Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cs.ubc.ca (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA07440 for ding@ifi.uio.no; Tue, 25 Jun 1996 10:21:24 -0700 >Received: by edmonds.home.cs.ubc.ca (Sendmail 8.7.5) id KAA25947; Tue, 25 Jun 1996 10:11:08 -0700 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-reply-to: Jack Vinson's message of 18 Jun 1996 11:57:03 -0400 X-Operating-System: Linux 1.99.7 #1-pre-2.0 Sat May 25 11:43:18 PDT 1996 X-Geek: http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/edmonds/doc/geek.html X-Homepage: http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/edmonds X-PGP-Ox6E86B769: This key is obsolete, please discard it. X-PGP-Ox979D0B09: A9 3E 1E CB 86 09 B1 E9 3C 1A 0E F6 49 F9 5D 99 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6940 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6940 >>>>> "Jack" == Jack Vinson writes: >>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Graaff writes: HdG> BTW, Jack, I noticed in gnus-bbdb.el that you mention that scoring HdG> on people in BBDB doesn't work yet. Is this still true? Will it get HdG> fixed? Jack> I don't use that piece of the code, so I have no idea. Hey, I wrote it, and even I don't use it. I thought it was a good idea at the time, but after playing with it a bit, I agree with Jack that adaptive scoring and a few static scores seems to work just fine. If someone puts in the time to get it working though, I'll gladly roll the patch into the distributed file. When I get back from AnimeExpo, I'll probably get around to upgrading to 5.2 finally, and maybe I'll feel inspired to add more features then... Brian.