From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7087
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Anthony Rossini <rossini@math.sc.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Picons and W3 stuff
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:55:55 -0400
Message-ID: <199607031955.PAA07213@neuromancer.stat.sc.edu>
Reply-To: rossini@stat.sc.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147448 5846 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:57:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:57:28 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA00499 for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 13:15:53 -0700
Original-Received: from neuromancer.stat.sc.edu ([129.252.16.112]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <VAA21424@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 21:57:04 +0200
Original-Received: (from rossini@localhost) by neuromancer.stat.sc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA07213; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:55:55 -0400
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: -<j)glPpyMxjjYa%o`Fl{cZ`VPI-#@E3@_s,TY%)xt`pIu^@MS+d9}>JZ8Fs2;tGK&eaV#.
 U#%d52]n51?][w92.tu+>13)STQ<hSb<b4ZL..rXV*s"Q=otWH?q*M"M|L|O!-[dHa)vx!@i2#+8l~
 fR]Pl&IMU=8";|)Sq-|;x#p]HL~oERC+JI
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7087
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7087


Hey -	
	Am I an idiot (likely), or is there a combination problem with
	using picons and getting the really cool in-line link
	highlighting/wfollowing with w3 stuff, using gnus-5.2.32 (also
	happened with the version shipped with XEmacs 19.14, 5.2.25 I
	think)?  I've tried the following:

;; PICONS -- but they don't work?
(setq gnus-use-picons t)
(add-hook 'gnus-article-display-hook 'gnus-article-display-picons t)
(add-hook 'gnus-article-prepare-hook 'gnus-group-display-picons t)
(add-hook 'gnus-article-display-hook 'gnus-picons-article-display-x-face t)
(setq gnus-picons-display-where 'article)

	but bad things happen:
		#1 - the *PICONS* buffer still appears, though the
		     picons are put into the article like they ought
		     to be, and
		#2 - the following of URLS goes away...  Which is
		     painfully bad and which I didn't realize I
		     used so much until it disappeared.
		#3 - Highlighting goes away, and the headers are not
		     stripped.  I think that I'm also losing the
		     inlined x-faces, as well

It seems like I'm removing some hook which sets up the last 2.5
things, but I'm not sure how (since after all, I'm "adding" hooks).

Thoughts? Or should I be sending more information re: the setup I'm
using?

(today just isn't made for elisp debugging, unfortunately -- it's an
xlispstat day...).

later,
-tony