From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8058
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: William Perry <wmperry@aventail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Problem with multi-line References
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:59:23 -0700
Message-ID: <199609261759.KAA31693@newman>
References: <x0k9thw9gk.fsf@doctor.sdsu.edu>
Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148282 9927 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:11:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:11:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA30025 for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:42:11 -0700
Original-Received: from newman (root@aventail.seanet.com [199.181.165.9]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <UAA27601@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 20:01:13 +0200
Original-Received: from kramer.aventail.com (root@newman [192.168.1.1]) by newman (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA31693; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 10:59:23 -0700
Original-To: Mark Boyns <boyns@sdsu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <x0k9thw9gk.fsf@doctor.sdsu.edu>
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8058
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8058

Mark Boyns writes:
>A friend mentioned to me that his newsreader is having problems with
>the References header that Gnus is generating.  Apparently Free Agent
>and Netscape cannot deal with a multi-line References header.  The
>exact header line looks like this:
>
>References: <51s9c0$jur@clark.zippo.com> <51uekc$mu2@carol.fwi.uva.nl>
>	<5261ig$2ue@scotsman.ed.ac.uk> <526k4e$oq6@goonsquad.spies.com>
>
>I have to assume that multi-line References are valid so I guess the
>other newsreaders are broken.  Maybe there should be a way to keep the
>References on a single line?

  This is just completely retarded behaviour on the other newsreaders
behalf.  Not understanding wrapped header lines is right up there with not
being able to handle virtual newsgroups.  OH wait...

-Bill P.