From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8364 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Brent B. Powers" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: sgnus -> rgnus -> qgnus? Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 22:11:16 -0400 Message-ID: <199610130211.WAA26318@swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148536 11716 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:15:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 11076 invoked from smtpd); 13 Oct 1996 02:42:02 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 13 Oct 1996 02:41:58 -0000 Original-Received: from mlfire.ml.com (mlfire.ml.com [192.246.100.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 13 Oct 1996 04:11:49 +0200 Original-Received: from ml1.ml.com ([199.201.57.130]) by mlfire.ml.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/MLgw-2.07) with ESMTP id WAA21622 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 22:13:26 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from swaps-post.swaps.ml.com (swaps-post.swaps.ml.com [199.201.39.40]) by ml1.ml.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/MLml-2.06) with ESMTP id WAA28336 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 22:12:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com (swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com [146.125.10.79]) by swaps-post.swaps.ml.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id WAA18810 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 22:11:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (powers@localhost) by swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id WAA26318; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 22:11:16 -0400 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8364 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8364 Michael R. Cook writes: > From: Michael R Cook > To: ding@ifi.uio.no > Subject: Re: sgnus -> rgnus -> qgnus? > Date: 11 Oct 1996 16:41:58 -0400 > > >>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > > >> There are only two problems with Quinoa.... First of all, it's not a > >> fruit, it's a grain. > > LMI> Who are we to quibble? > > >> Secondly, the pronunciation is so odd that only > >> those truly interested in esoterica will be able to pronounce it > >> properly (Think Keen-wah, accent on the first syllable). > > LMI> I think that's a feature, not a bug. :-) > > If you'd like a difficult-to-pronounce, okay-if-not-quiet-a-fruit, Q-name, I > can do one better: Quincunx Gnus. > > \'kwin-,k*n(k)s : an arrangement of five plant parts. > > It's got the "Gnus 5" base covered, too. :-) Hmmm, more generally, ANY arrangement of 5 parts... but it was such a god-awfully bad novel (a Dicken's wannabe, without the charm... I kept waiting for McCawber (sp?) to show up)