From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8551 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Justin Sheehy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: New sketch Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 19:25:12 -0500 Message-ID: <199610310025.TAA15803@k2.ccs.neu.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148694 12794 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 5097 invoked from smtpd); 31 Oct 1996 00:44:20 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 1996 00:44:19 -0000 Original-Received: from maud.ifi.uio.no (0@maud.ifi.uio.no [129.240.74.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 01:26:32 +0100 Original-Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu (root@amber.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.111.100]) by maud.ifi.uio.no ; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 01:26:31 +0100 Original-Received: from k2.ccs.neu.edu (root@k2.ccs.neu.edu [129.10.112.116]) by amber.ccs.neu.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA29285; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 19:25:14 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost.ccs.neu.edu (dworkin@localhost.ccs.neu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by k2.ccs.neu.edu (8.7.5/8.6.4) with SMTP id TAA15803; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 19:25:13 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: k2.ccs.neu.edu: Host dworkin@localhost.ccs.neu.edu [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol Original-To: Steinar Bang In-reply-to: Your message of "30 Oct 1996 12:04:12 +0100." Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8551 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8551 >>>>> "Steinar" == Steinar Bang writes: Steinar> Weeell, Tovarich.... I would prefer plain old "Proletariat" Steinar> to "Proletcult". I agree somewhat, but wouldn't it be more correct to say "Proletarian" than "Proletariat"? (As the former means a member of the latter) -Justin