Re: Problem with nnvirtual in 0.72?

["St. Suika Fenderson Roberts" <wrobert2@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu>]

I don't think this problem is in nnvirtual, for the simple reason that
nnvirtual worked in 0.70 and didn't in 0.72, and no changes were made to
_it_ in that span.

It just seems to be loosing marks.  I haven't run catchup on any of my
groups where I've noticed this, but I do read them to the end,
generally.  When one leaves an article or two it seems to prevent/lessen
the number of article marks that get lost.

At least it isn't loosing ! marks too often ^_^

hope this helps,
	Suika (who munged up a functional `update dribble buffer'
function ^_^ )
--
		wrobert2@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu
        I am Carl of Borg.  Macross has been assimilated.