From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9553
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "William M. Perry" <wmperry@aventail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Kerberos functionality?
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 14:51:38 -0800
Message-ID: <199701222251.OAA19215@newman>
References: <199701221709.MAA04970@nda.nda.com>
	<x7680ptppc.fsf@gkar.asds.com>
	<uwwt51j62.fsf@maru.schenley.com>
Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149561 19163 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:32:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:32:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA12735
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 15:19:58 -0800
Original-Received: from newman (root@newman.aventail.com [38.225.141.10]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <XAA05447@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 23:53:10 +0100
Original-Received: from kramer.in.aventail.com.aventail.com (wmperry@kramer [192.168.1.12]) by newman (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA19215; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 14:51:38 -0800
Original-To: "Michael Welsh Duggan" <md5i@schenley.com>
In-Reply-To: <uwwt51j62.fsf@maru.schenley.com>
Errors-to: wmperry@aventail.com
X-Face: O~Rn;(l][/-o1sALg4A@xpE:9-"'IR[%;,,!m7</SYF`{vYQ(&RI1&EiH[FvT;J}@f!4kfz
 x_!Y#=y{Uuj9GvUi=cPuajQ(Z42R[wE@{G,sn$qGr5g/wnb*"*ktI+,CD}1Z'wxrM2ag-r0p5I6\nA
 [WJopW_J.WY;
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9553
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9553

Michael Welsh Duggan writes:
>Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@PrescientTech.com> writes:
>
>> If you are using a Kerberized movemail program, you have it.  If you are
>> not, you should.  Implementing Kerberos authentication in Emacs-Lisp is
>> probably unfeasable, and is a project I have no intention of tackling.
>
>Actually, high on my wish list is Kerberos for emacs, in the c-code,
>with some functions to access it.  (Maybe integrated into
>open-network-stream.)

  This wouldn't be too hard.  I've had patches to do this for SSL in Emacs
for about a year now (using SSLeay of course), but haven't distributed them
for fear of jailtime. :)  I'll have to whip them into shape next time I
have some spare time.

-Bill p.