From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9698 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Brent B. Powers" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: cache deletion Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:18:33 -0500 Message-ID: <199701291518.KAA05322@swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149681 19976 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:34:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA28642 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 07:36:20 -0800 Original-Received: from wfdutilgw.ml.com (wfdutilf01.ml.com [206.3.74.31]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 16:19:22 +0100 Original-Received: from ml1.ml.com ([199.201.57.130]) by wfdutilgw.ml.com (8.8.4/8.8.4/MLgw-3.03) with ESMTP id KAA11284 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:17:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from swaps-post.swaps.ml.com (swaps-post.swaps.ml.com [199.201.39.40]) by ml1.ml.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/MLml-2.06) with ESMTP id KAA02863 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:21:15 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com (swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com [146.125.10.79]) by swaps-post.swaps.ml.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id KAA04522 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:18:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (powers@localhost) by swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA05322; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:18:33 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Mailer: VM 6.08/XEmacs 20.0 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9698 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9698 Has anyone (Lars) ever considered additional values for gnus-prefetched-article-deletion-strategy? For instance, it might be nice to leave ticked articles in the cache, even if they've been read