From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10089
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Edward J. Sabol" <sabol@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: DWIM fix to message.el (TAB handling)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 10:22:41 -0500
Message-ID: <199703051522.KAA27245@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov>
References: <m2bu8y931k.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150016 22327 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:40:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:40:16 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from riker.diamond-lane.net (root@riker [206.190.83.4])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA14737
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 07:42:31 -0800
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by riker.diamond-lane.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA26236
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 07:52:12 -0800
Original-Received: from alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov (alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.127.237]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <QAA00903@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 16:22:43 +0100
Original-Received: by alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov (950413.SGI.8.6.12/951211.SGI.AUTO)
	 id KAA27245; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 10:22:41 -0500
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-reply-to: <m2bu8y931k.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> (message from Lars
	Magne Ingebrigtsen on 05 Mar 1997 09:05:43 +0100)
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10089
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10089

Excerpts from mail: (05-Mar-97) Re: DWIM fix to message.el (TAB handling) by Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
>
> Hm... I just tried "dingTAB" in the Cc header, and it did expand the
> alias...
>
> Christopher Davis <ckd@loiosh.kei.com> writes:
>
>>  As a side effect of inserting a TAB in the buffer, right?
>> 
>> That's not really desirable. (Either that or the newsgroup completion
>> should do the same thing ;)
>
> Well -- it doesn't matter whether you have white space at the end of
> lines, I think.

It does to us perfectionists. Before I started using Kai's message-x.el, I
was always hitting TAB followed immediately by DEL when expanding mail
abbrevs.