From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12651 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus date suggestion Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 15:59:52 -0400 Message-ID: <199710211959.PAA12300@black-ice.cc.vt.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1497179022P"; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152149 4932 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:15:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: François Pinard , Kyle Jones , joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson), "(ding) Gnus Mailing List" , XEmacs Beta Discussion List Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA08875 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 14:13:33 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA13106 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 16:15:27 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.7/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id WAA10202 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 22:00:11 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (qmail 1771 invoked by uid 504); 21 Oct 1997 20:00:06 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 1768 invoked from network); 21 Oct 1997 20:00:06 -0000 Original-Received: from black-ice.cc.vt.edu (128.173.14.71) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 1997 20:00:06 -0000 Original-Received: from black-ice.cc.vt.edu (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by black-ice.cc.vt.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA12300; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 15:59:53 -0400 Original-To: Jason R Mastaler In-Reply-To: Your message of "21 Oct 1997 13:03:10 MDT." X-Url: http://black-ice.cc.vt.edu/~valdis/ X-Face: 34C9$Ewd2zeX+\!i1BA\j{ex+$/V'JBG#;3_noWWYPa"|,I#`R"{n@w>#:{)FXyiAS7(8t( ^*w5O*!8O9YTe[r{e%7(yVRb|qxsRYw`7J!`AM}m_SHaj}f8eb@d^L>BrX7iO[ This thread never seems to die. As Johan Danielsson said two > months ago when this was last brought up, > > "Enough of this now. The way to write dates in mail messages is defined > by RFC822. If anyone want's to change this, just write a new RFC." Except as modified by RFC1123, section 5,2,14, which addressed the Y2K problem (in Oct 1989 no less). I only bring this up because an anal-retentive RFC822 parser that is not RFC1123-cognizant will run into some indigestion in some 801 days. -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech --==_Exmh_-1497179022P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNE0Jt9QBOOoptg9JAQGpeQP+P+dujMnYXk1aUvtTpPblIwhJNao3dD+4 dfnaN1ttiMfSdQ1fV5aPXKxdOxuO0FoytJ/TCTMnL9C1TfGhbYQeHcoEEpm1B9dt roDOgoN1KkTZf26RO2P0lamD3kNPyT2Ca/AAqAr5vOxbEy3pYbfq/nCmVlcCte3B hlnqVPLfBcg= =olba -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --==_Exmh_-1497179022P--