From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19067 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Edward J. Sabol" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME composition, dumb question Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:30:08 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <199811231630.LAA09483@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> References: <86ogq1wpzq.fsf@ponoka.battleriver.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157485 9672 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:44:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA28806 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:30:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB07603; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:30:36 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:30:23 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA13857 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:30:16 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov (alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.16.213]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA28782 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:30:06 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov (950413.SGI.8.6.12/951211.SGI.AUTO) id LAA09483; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:30:08 -0500 Original-To: Gnus Mailing List In-reply-to: <86ogq1wpzq.fsf@ponoka.battleriver.com> (message from Dale Hagglund on 20 Nov 1998 21:53:45 -0800) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19067 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19067 Excerpts from mail: (20-Nov-98) Re: MIME composition, dumb question by Dale Hagglund > I actually think that `C-c C-m' is easier to type the `M-o'. From a > touch-typist point of view, it's not the *length* of the key sequence, > so much as how easy the finger movements involved are. I like `C-c C-m' better than `M-o' as well. There's nothing particularly mnemonic about `M-o'.