From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22775 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Pinard?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mailcrypt Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:06:35 -0400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <199904231606.MAA01928@jupiter.rtsq.qc.ca> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160633 31090 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:37:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA03830 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:09:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB11910; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:08:36 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:08:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA23558 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:08:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from jupiter.rtsq.qc.ca (rtsq.grics.qc.ca [199.84.132.81]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA03809 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:08:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by jupiter.rtsq.qc.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA01928; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:06:35 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: jupiter.rtsq.qc.ca: pinard set sender to pinard@iro.umontreal.ca using -f Original-To: ratinox@peorth.gweep.net In-reply-to: (message from Stainless Steel Rat on 07 Sep 1998 15:40:40 -0400) X-Face: "b_m|CE6#'Q8fliQrwHl9K,]PA_o'*S~Dva{~b1n*)K*A(BIwQW.:LY?t4~xhYka_.LV?Qq `}X|71X0ea&H]9Dsk!`kxBXlG;q$mLfv_vtaHK_rHFKu]4'<*LWCyUe@ZcI6"*wB5M@[m PH> I have PGP 5.0, and had mailcrypt working fine under emacs, but > PH> when I went to xemacs (20.4), I get an error message when I fire > PH> up emacs that states that it can't set version 5.0. > mailcrypt must be byte-compiled for the Emacs and Gnus you are using, > otherwise it will not work. How could it make such a difference? I thought that running byte-compiled or not should not make a difference, or else, I would see a bug. Don't you? -- François Pinard mailto:pinard@iro.umontreal.ca Join the free Translation Project! http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard