From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23082 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefanie Teufel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: PGP/MIME Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 23:31:04 +0200 Organization: In Teufels Kueche Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <19990528233103.A3205@diabolo.ndh.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160882 32607 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:41:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA11519 for ; Fri, 28 May 1999 17:32:07 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB19076; Fri, 28 May 1999 16:32:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 28 May 1999 16:32:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA11726 for ; Fri, 28 May 1999 16:32:06 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from diabolo.ndh.net (root@port020.koeln.ndh.net [195.94.92.20]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA11461 for ; Fri, 28 May 1999 17:31:01 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from stefanie@localhost) by diabolo.ndh.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA03234 for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 28 May 1999 23:31:04 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Bruce Stephens on Fri, May 28, 1999 at 10:13:13PM +0100 X-plonked: Yep. Mein Dank ans Jost-Kollektiv. Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23082 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23082 On Fri, May 28, 1999 at 22:13:13 +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote: > I remember there was discussion about this (and how mailcrypt doesn't Jep, it was me who tried to persuade someone on thi list to write that piece of code - to no avail until now... Stefanie