From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5060 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: gregt@visix.com (Greg Thompson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-group-highlight Date: 06 Feb 1996 13:18:51 -0500 Organization: Visix Software Inc. Sender: gregt@visix.com Message-ID: <1l20o8iagk.fsf@zagato.visix.com> References: <9602061531.AA16220@pog.ufl.edu> Reply-To: gregt@visix.com NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035145716 31653 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:28:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA19671 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 11:11:32 -0800 Original-Received: from shelby.visix.com (shelby-102.visix.com [149.62.102.251]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 19:19:27 +0100 Original-Received: from zagato.visix.com (zagato.visix.com [149.62.101.48]) by shelby.visix.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA24061 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 13:18:52 -0500 Original-Received: by zagato.visix.com (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA35900; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 13:18:51 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Attribution: gt In-Reply-To: "Dr. Pete Gieser"'s message of Tue, 06 Feb 96 10:31:24 -0500 Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5060 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5060 >"PG" == "Dr Pete Gieser" writes: PG> Can someone explain to me how to configure this? At present PG> group names are dark green on a dark background. i've set mine to: (setq gnus-group-highlight `(((> unread 99) . ,(custom-face-lookup "OrangeRed" nil nil nil nil nil)) ((> unread 19) . ,(custom-face-lookup "PaleGreen" nil nil nil nil nil)))) that makes groups with 20 or more messages show up green, and groups with more 100 or more show up red. except for not coloring unsubscribed groups differently, this gives the same results as joe h's old font-lock keywords for the group buffer, which i'd kinda gotten used to. -greg