From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31412 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabrice Popineau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: sending attachements via gnus Date: 13 Jun 2000 15:53:57 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <1z21g00a.fsf@supelec.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035167825 13833 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:37:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61543D0525 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 10:00:27 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAC29199; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 08:56:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 13 Jun 2000 08:55:56 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA09206 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 08:55:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from esemetz.ese-metz.fr (esemetz.ese-metz.fr [193.48.224.212]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3731D0525 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 09:56:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from NEVERYON.ese-metz.fr (neveryon.ese-metz.fr [193.48.224.220]) by esemetz.ese-metz.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA24423; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 15:56:48 +0200 Original-To: xemacs-nt@xemacs.org Original-Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) XEmacs/21.2 (Molpe) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31412 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31412 The patches by Mike Alexander have made things working better, but still I can't get to send say a 2Mb file attached. Now after some investigation in smtpmail (since this is what I'm using on NT), I wonder where the problem really is. Can anybody confirm using any Unix (or maybe Cygwin ? ) version of xemacs that smtpmail is able to send a large buffer ? It seems that the loop sending the buffer line by line aborts before the end (smtpmail-send-data function), and then a QUIT is sent to the smtp server, but with no answer (the smtp server is waiting for a '.', isn't it ?). So the whole thing hang. Any suggestion ? I'll try to do more investigation when I will have time. -- Fabrice Popineau