From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/29066 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pieter Wenk Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Answered messages not marked correctly Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:17:04 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <20000203091704.B479@sre-4-139.urbanet.ch> References: <20000131082256.B717@sre-4-139.urbanet.ch> <20000201080657.A549@sre-4-139.urbanet.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035165800 603 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:03:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCEAD0521 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 06:09:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAB23784; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 05:05:48 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 03 Feb 2000 05:04:47 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA24152 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 05:04:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from monterosa.urbanet.ch (monterosa.urbanet.ch [195.202.193.104]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 83C8AD0521 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 06:04:31 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 10659 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2000 08:17:49 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO sre-4-139.urbanet.ch) (195.202.209.139) by monterosa.urbanet.ch with SMTP; 3 Feb 2000 08:17:49 -0000 Original-Received: (from p.wenk@localhost) by sre-4-139.urbanet.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA00927 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:17:04 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: X-Uptime: 7:42am up 6 min, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.33, 0.16 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29066 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29066 On mer, 02 fév 2000, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>> "KK" == Karl Kleinpaste writes: > >KK> If you've actually replied to more than this, then something has >KK> induced the destruction of the rest of the reply list. > >KK> I can't explain that; I've never seen it happen, in any version of >KK> Gnus. > >This happens to me way too often (once a week at least; occasionally it >happens multiple times per day). Sometimes the reply list is nuked, >sometimes it's the 'tick' list; the latter is especially painful because if >expiry kicks in then I can permanently lose mail. What happens is that I >tick a message, leave the group and later come back to see that only that >most recently ticked message is still there. I cannot correlate this with >any other activity or any specific configuration settings. > >I have resorted to backing up .newsrc.eld a few times a day and manually >pasting the reply and tick lists back in when they disappear. A few days ago, I have sent a similar message to this group exactly for the same subject. Now I start to understand, why messages are just wanishing. I thought gnus to be a reliable NR...but with such behaviors, it will become akward to be used. Is this a bug ? Regards -- / / (_)____ __ ____ __ Pieter Wenk / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / Vevey/Switzerland /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\