From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/30194 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai=?iso-8859-1?q?_Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Movement ops Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 17:22:23 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <200004221522.RAA04582@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> References: <9t9iu2azkaw.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> <200004212141.XAA03736@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035166759 7202 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:19:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7D5D051E for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 11:22:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB01735; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 10:22:47 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 22 Apr 2000 10:22:17 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20466 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 10:22:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C70CD051E for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 11:22:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id RAA11334 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 17:22:23 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160]) by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id RAA10905; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 17:22:23 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost) by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id RAA04582; Sat, 22 Apr 2000 17:22:23 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de: grossjoh set sender to Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE using -f Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "22 Apr 2000 14:10:18 +0200" User-Agent: Gnus/5.0805 (Gnus v5.8.5) Emacs/21.0.90 Original-Lines: 43 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30194 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30194 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > (setq gnus-summary-goto-unread nil) Marvellous! Why didn't I try this before? Hm. I think the documentation is a bit misleading: /---- | gnus-summary-goto-unread's value is | never | | Documentation: | *If t, many commands will go to the next unread article. | This applies to marking commands as well as other commands that | "naturally" select the next article, like, for instance, `SPC' at | the end of an article. | If nil, only the marking commands will go to the next (un)read article. | If `never', commands that usually go to the next unread article, will | go to the next article, whether it is read or not. | | You can customize this variable. | | Defined in `gnus-sum'. \---- It says, if the variable is t, many commands will go to the next unread artile, and if it is nil, only some commands will go to the next (un)read article. Shouldn't the documentation read like this? /---- | If t, many commands will go to the next unread article. This applies | [...] end of an article. If nil, the marking commands do NOT go to | the next unread article (they go to the next article instead). \---- Sorry for not trying this out in the first place. I'm a happy camper now. kai -- Beware of flying birch trees.