From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/30662
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Switching to IMAP
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 17:16:56 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <200005041516.RAA04768@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <wpu2gfr91d.fsf@CompleteIS.com>
	<200005041244.OAA03906@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<dppur2jwpo.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035167166 9653 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:26:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:26:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D50D0522
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Thu,  4 May 2000 11:20:03 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB17649;
	Thu, 4 May 2000 10:19:58 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 04 May 2000 10:19:17 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA26682
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 4 May 2000 10:19:06 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de (waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34BAD051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu,  4 May 2000 11:17:14 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.159]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de  with ESMTP id RAA13881; Thu, 4 May 2000 17:16:57 +0200 (MES)
Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.20.160])
	by marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de id RAA13043; Thu, 4 May 2000 17:16:56 +0200 (MET DST)
Original-Received: (from grossjoh@localhost)
	by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id RAA04768;
	Thu, 4 May 2000 17:16:56 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de: grossjoh set sender to Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE using -f
Original-To: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@iskon.hr>
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "04 May 2000 15:01:23 +0200"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/21.0.90
Original-Lines: 23
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30662
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30662

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@iskon.hr> writes:

> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes:
>=20
> > The `\Deleted' flag has nothing to do with expiry, though.  That's a
> > different flag.
>=20
> I'm not convinced of that.  Isn't the "delete" flag equivalent to the
> Gnus expiry concept, the latter being more generic?

Hm.  Maybe I shouldn't have said `nothing to do with'.  Hm.  I should
have said this, I think:

    The `\Deleted' flag and the expirable flag have a similar purpose
    but are distinct flags.

The documentation for nnimap mentions that Gnus can't display messages
at all which are flagged `\Deleted', but this does not apply to the
expirable flag, since it is a different flag.

kai
--=20
Beware of flying birch trees.