From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32539 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Love Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: \201 irritation! :-) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:23:22 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <200009221423.PAA10322@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> References: <200009051416.PAA09817@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> <200009082344.AAA16828@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> <200009131925.UAA25331@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> <200009141218.e8ECIcr03878@zsh.2y.net> <200009142150.WAA27644@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> <200009142306.e8EN6su10947@zsh.2y.net> <200009181351.OAA02740@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> <200009181439.e8IEdb703834@zsh.2y.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168809 20395 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:53:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25485D051E for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 10:24:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAC05044; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:24:13 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:23:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA14542 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 09:23:00 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from djlvig.dl.ac.uk (djlvig.dl.ac.uk [148.79.112.146]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E75AD051E for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 10:23:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from fx@localhost) by djlvig.dl.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.5) id PAA10322; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:23:22 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: djlvig.dl.ac.uk: fx set sender to d.love@dl.ac.uk using -f X-Face: "_!nmR@11ZNuumt0oqG"Y3Hfy|;FGz)`"ul[G?ah6k-oNyDW?3/Nq3Qab$kUnUQ_d4};kPl R=}-Vqfo|S5mThi-kaBR=>%g5a3-OvnEhdHu{^APIaP:b}0m!$bDC>SX zz'r)e?`at?tpD*+~b+pf Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: ShengHuo ZHU's message of "Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:39:37 -0400" User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90 Original-Lines: 30 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32539 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32539 >>>>> "ZSH" == ShengHuo ZHU writes: ZSH> Maybe it is OK for characters between \200-\237, but not for those ZSH> between \240-\377, i.e. eight-bit-graphic. unibyte-char-to-multibyte ZSH> converts them to latin-iso8859-1. Of course. ZSH> Suppose to insert a unibyte string with \337 to a multibyte ZSH> buffer, I always get ß, unless using the number (insert "0123" ZSH> 223 "ABCD"). Yes, text is meant to be converted that way. ZSH> Maybe unibyte-char is converted to latin-iso8859-1 The conversion depend on `nonascii-insert-offset', though I think that will default to Latin-1/ ZSH> on purpose for compatibility, but in the second case it would be ZSH> ugly. I'm not sure I understand that. ZSH> It illustrates some cases in Gnus, getting data from network (in ZSH> a unibyte buffer) then copying them to multibyte buffer for ZSH> decoding. That seems to me like the wrong thing to do.