From: Dave Love <d.love@dl.ac.uk>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Display X-Face and save space
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:49:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200009261349.OAA17106@djlvig.dl.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Wes Hardaker's message of "25 Sep 2000 09:42:05 -0700"
>>>>> "WH" == Wes Hardaker <wjhardaker@ucdavis.edu> writes:
WH> You know, I really don't understand the copyright assignment
WH> issue. I mean, if I release the code under the GPL then it
WH> should satisfy the FSF.
I don't speak for them, but the FSF is surely happy that you release
free software. Thanks.
WH> Why they need to "own" the copyright makes no sense to me.
I'm not sure making sense is relevant in law. This is definitely
major grief for us as maintainers, but has to be taken seriously. :-(
The longstanding legal advice -- apparently not just to the FSF -- is
that for defence in court against violations of the licence there
should be a single copyright holder, or perhaps only a few. I'm not
sure of the exact position; maybe all holders of copyright in a
combined work have to be involved. In exceptional circumstances there
is a specific licence to the FSF instead of assignment.
By the way, the contract licenses the assigner to do as they like with
their contribution, so assigning loses nothing of practical
importance. It's a legal technicality.
WH> Filling out the form once wouldn't prevent me from writing more
WH> code in the future to the same piece and that code wouldn't be
WH> owned by them (unless they explicitly cover future modifications
WH> in their form).
That's what it normally says.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-09-26 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-17 13:50 Kai Großjohann
2000-09-17 15:27 ` Raymond Scholz
2000-09-17 22:05 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-09-18 11:02 ` Toby Speight
2000-09-18 11:56 ` Raymond Scholz
2000-09-19 16:34 ` Toby Speight
2000-09-18 16:48 ` Dan Christensen
2000-09-18 16:53 ` Roland Mas
2000-09-18 22:31 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-09-19 1:33 ` Dan Christensen
2000-09-19 10:02 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-09-20 3:23 ` Dan Christensen
2000-09-18 14:27 ` Dave Love
2000-09-18 16:27 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-09-19 16:42 ` Wes Hardaker
2000-09-20 0:36 ` Steve Youngs
2000-09-21 17:08 ` Wes Hardaker
2000-09-23 2:26 ` Steve Youngs
2000-09-25 16:38 ` Wes Hardaker
2000-09-21 19:54 ` Dave Love
2000-09-25 16:42 ` Wes Hardaker
2000-09-26 13:49 ` Dave Love [this message]
2000-09-28 16:42 ` Wes Hardaker
2000-10-03 17:22 ` Per Abrahamsen
[not found] ` <200010032202.XAA32394@djlvig.dl.ac.uk>
2000-10-04 20:59 ` Wes Hardaker
2000-10-05 19:46 ` Dave Love
2000-10-05 21:59 ` François Pinard
2000-10-09 21:48 ` Wes Hardaker
2000-09-21 19:48 ` Dave Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200009261349.OAA17106@djlvig.dl.ac.uk \
--to=d.love@dl.ac.uk \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).