From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32695
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: gnus-ignored-from-addresses puzzler
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:13:11 -0400
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <200010031213.e93CDBR05256@zsh.2y.net>
References: <m2vgva1zm4.fsf@pgnus-5.8.8-cvs.now.playing>
	<200010030241.e932fGp02918@zsh.2y.net> <ltbsx2y796.fsf@asfast.com>
	<200010030257.e932vZ602990@zsh.2y.net>
	<20001003035257.A9495@reader.ptw.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168935 21225 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:55:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:55:35 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D63BD051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Tue,  3 Oct 2000 08:12:31 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAC09682;
	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:58 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 03 Oct 2000 07:11:13 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA18418
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:02 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from zsh.2y.net (d185fd01c.rochester.rr.com [24.95.208.28])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377BAD051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue,  3 Oct 2000 08:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost)
	by zsh.2y.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e93CDBR05256;
	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 08:13:11 -0400
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Attribution: ZSH
X-Face: 'IF:e51ib'Qbl^(}l^&4-J`'P!@[4~O|&k#:@Gld#b/]oMq&`&FVY._3+b`mzp~Jeve~/#/
 ERD!OTe<86UhyN=l`mrPY)M7_}`Ktt\K+58Z!hu7>qU,i.N7TotU[FYE(f1;}`g2xj!u*l`^&=Q!g{
 *q|<EDbQtg9{wfQuI,#r#{'A,\!95my:/,]"s,O4nzqxNL.}WrHA>ddto|nkt"$r,K$[)"|6,elPH=
 GJ6Q
In-Reply-To: <20001003035257.A9495@reader.ptw.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90
Original-Lines: 21
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32695
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32695

Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:

> Sorry about the lack of clarity:  The two posts I mentioned were
> posted with different applications but they were retrieved by
> fetchmail and sorted/saved by gnus in nnml backend.  So the same
> applications handled them on the incoming side.  And gnus was the only
> application involved in splitting and saving to nnml groups.

Weird. 

> Regenerating the data base in my ding group cleaned it up.  But still
> curious why that would happen, since as mentioned, gnus was the only
> app involved in saving.
> 
> I've posted this with mutt to see if gnus will show the header
> differently again when I download the message resent by  ding list and
> incorporate it into my gnus setup. (with gnus)

Does it show the different header again?

ShengHuo