From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32709
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: mml bug?
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:25:03 -0400
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <200010031525.e93FP3S01148@zsh.2y.net>
References: <i5k4s2ujcwn.Wong@gromit.ph.surrey.ac.uk>
	<200010031339.e93Ddtf05605@zsh.2y.net>
	<i5kd7hihscb.skittle@gromit.ph.surrey.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168947 21304 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:55:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:55:47 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D061ED051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Tue,  3 Oct 2000 11:24:03 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAC00905;
	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:23:50 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 03 Oct 2000 10:23:14 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20059
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 10:23:03 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from zsh.2y.net (d185fd01c.rochester.rr.com [24.95.208.28])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D16ED051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue,  3 Oct 2000 11:23:19 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost)
	by zsh.2y.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e93FP3S01148;
	Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:25:03 -0400
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Attribution: ZSH
X-Face: 'IF:e51ib'Qbl^(}l^&4-J`'P!@[4~O|&k#:@Gld#b/]oMq&`&FVY._3+b`mzp~Jeve~/#/
 ERD!OTe<86UhyN=l`mrPY)M7_}`Ktt\K+58Z!hu7>qU,i.N7TotU[FYE(f1;}`g2xj!u*l`^&=Q!g{
 *q|<EDbQtg9{wfQuI,#r#{'A,\!95my:/,]"s,O4nzqxNL.}WrHA>ddto|nkt"$r,K$[)"|6,elPH=
 GJ6Q
In-Reply-To: <i5kd7hihscb.skittle@gromit.ph.surrey.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.90
Original-Lines: 13
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32709
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32709

Paul Stevenson <p.stevenson@surrey.ac.uk> writes:

> ah.  Yes, they come from the mailcap entries put there by netscape
> (mailcap-mime-types) gives:
> ("desc=\"postscript" "type=application/postscript" "desc=\"portable"
> "type=application/pdf" ... )
> 
> Does this reflect incorrect parsing of the mailcap file, or is gnus
> doing the right thing?

I don't know.  Could you show me your mailcap file?

ShengHuo