From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54099 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Disable mailcap support Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:04:34 +0200 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <20030929180434.GA4835@deneb.enyo.de> References: <20030928161139.GA31465@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1064858785 6485 80.91.224.253 (29 Sep 2003 18:06:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2640@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Sep 29 20:06:02 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A42PJ-00069u-00 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:06:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1A42O6-0006QB-00; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:04:46 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1A42O2-0006Q6-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:04:42 -0500 Original-Received: from gw.enyo.de (sinma-gmbh.17.mind.de [212.21.92.17]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBAA3A0063 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:04:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from deneb.enyo.de ([212.9.189.171]) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A42Nu-000219-VA; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:04:34 +0200 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.20) id 1A42Nu-0001Hv-T5; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:04:34 +0200 Original-To: Jesper Harder Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54099 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54099 On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:56:29AM +0200, Jesper Harder wrote: > Why should we a priori consider, say, xdvi less safe than some of the > libraries (libpng, libtiff, zlib etc.) that Emacs is built against? xdvi can invoke Netscape or Mozilla, the libraries don't do _that_. 8-) But I see your point. Maybe image support should be disabled, too? At least the pictures should not be shown by default (certainly a good idea anyway because of some junk mail).