From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57470 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Timothy Brown Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: IMAP Splitting with multiple mailboxes (was Re: Spam splitting and multiple nnimap methods) Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 10:02:00 -0400 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <20040518100200.A12085@gwyn.tux.org> References: <20040517175042.B23864@gwyn.tux.org> <20040518085316.A4024@gwyn.tux.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084888952 4937 80.91.224.253 (18 May 2004 14:02:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M6010@lists.math.uh.edu Tue May 18 16:02:24 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BQ5Am-0005mi-00 for ; Tue, 18 May 2004 16:02:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BQ5AY-0001v9-00; Tue, 18 May 2004 09:02:10 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BQ5AU-0001v3-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 18 May 2004 09:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BQ5AR-0005eY-Lt for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 18 May 2004 09:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [199.184.165.135]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F633A0215 for ; Tue, 18 May 2004 09:02:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from tim@localhost) by gwyn.tux.org (8.11.6p2/8.9.1) id i4IE21S19587 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 18 May 2004 10:02:01 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20040518085316.A4024@gwyn.tux.org>; from tim@tux.org on Tue, May 18, 2004 at 08:53:16AM -0400 Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57470 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57470 Can someone provide a better explanation of how IMAP spam-splitting and standard splitting, particularly with multiple servers, interact? i've read the manual and the sections on virtual server spam splitting but i'm still a little lost, particularly in combinations using :spam-split. In short: 1) I am using fancy splitting; 2) I have spam-split as part of my splitting rules; 3) I am not specifying any nnimap+host:folder definitions. Do I need to be using the virtual server stuff, as 6.5.1 in the Manual suggests? If so, how does this work with fancy splitting? Thanks, Tim > Does that split to the spam group locally (nnfolder), does it split to > the IMAP group on that particular server, or does it split to an IMAP > group on a different server? And when is split-group looked at? Many > times my messages will say they are being "IMAP split host:INBOX:xx to INBOX" > but Gnus never sees them as part of that mailbox. They aren't being lost, > exactly, but they do exist. Also, how does splitting on nnimap, and > spam-split, interact? So far i've had terrible luck with imap splitting, > even with splitting on the bodies as the manual says. > > This is one area where Gnus' flexibility is giving me a huge headache - the > manual just isn't clear enough.