From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/29147 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Norman Walsh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Inexplicable F/S w behavior Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 07:05:17 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <2405-Wed09Feb2000070517-0500-ndw@nwalsh.com> Reply-To: Norman Walsh NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035165868 1128 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:04:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E76D051E for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 07:07:23 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAB20140; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 06:07:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 09 Feb 2000 06:06:40 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA10170 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 06:06:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from nexus.berkshire.net (nexus.berkshire.net [206.72.196.10]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD11DD051E for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 07:06:30 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from nwalshpc.berkshire.net (nwalshpc.nwalsh.com [140.186.114.234]) by nexus.berkshire.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA29255 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 07:05:53 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: emacs 20.4.1 (via feedmail 7 I) Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-URL: http://nwalsh.com/ X-Millennium: T-minus 46 weeks, 4 days, 17 hours, 6 minutes, 34 seconds User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 Original-Lines: 57 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29147 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29147 I get enough mail at work that's been CC'd from here to eternity that I'm just in the habit of using 'F' (apparently equivalent to 'S w') to reply to messages. Then I delete the CC's as appropriate. (This is all in 5.8.3, btw) So recently I got a message from somone and discovered that neither F nor S w do "the right thing". Rather than saying To: xxx@yyy.com CC: Norman Walsh it says simply To: Norman Walsh So I looked at all the headers on the message and only two headers (that I think could possibly be significant) differ. The message causing the bad behavior has: Return-Receipt-To: xxx@yyy.com Reply-To: xxx@yyy.com So I thought that reply-to might be the problem (although it is correct). But, even if I set broken-reply-to in the group parameters, I still get the bad behavior. Any thoughts? Here are the complete headers from the message that causes the bad behavior: X-From-Line: xxx@yyy.com Tue Feb 8 21:13:51 2000 Received: from venus.kstream.com (venus.kstream.com [38.156.71.12]) by nexus.berkshire.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA24303 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 21:13:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from XXX.ksp.com (XXX [38.156.71.103]) by venus.kstream.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id 1RQ3FXZ2; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 21:13:45 -0500 To: Norman Walsh Subject: docbook/xml Return-Receipt-To: xxx@yyy.com Reply-To: xxx@yyy.com X-Attribution: Xxx X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Mail-Copies-To: never From: Date: 08 Feb 2000 21:13:38 -0500 X-Sent: 9 hours, 45 minutes, 58 seconds ago X-Gnus-Mail-Source: file:~/.incoming/mail.spool Message-ID: X-Content-Length: 375 Cheers, norm -- Norman Walsh | All things are contingent. And http://nwalsh.com/ | there is chaos.--Spalding Gray