Re: MH-E and Gnus tool bar icons

[Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 387 bytes --]

Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 22 2006, Bill Wohler wrote:
> 
> > Hmmm, the separator in the GNOME tool bars looks a lot better. I
> > modified your separator to look more like the GNOME separator. Do you
> > mind if I check in my version of separator.xpm?
> 
> No.  But maybe you could post your separator.xpm, so I can see how it
> looks like in Gnus.


[-- Attachment #2: Separator --]
[-- Type: image/x-xpmi, Size: 243 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 902 bytes --]


> BTW, on your screen shot[1], I looks like you didn't set ":enable
> nil":

Right. Check out mh-tool-bar.el. I had added "nil" to its
mh-tool-bar-define entry, but it didn't seem to take. I've asked Satyaki
if he could take a look into it.

> [1] Wouldn't PNG be more suitable than JPEG for posting small screen shots?

Probably. It's just habit. If I knew that PNG was less lossy, more
compressed, and could be read by *all* systems, I'd probably use it
more, but I haven't read such an analysis yet. Do you know how it fares
against JPG? PNG *is* a compressed, lossy format, isn't it? Or is it not
lossy and better to compare against GIF?

I do know that IE has some problems with transparent PNGs.

-- 
Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.