From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/62368 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Wohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.mail.mh-e.devel Subject: Re: MH-E and Gnus tool bar icons Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:14:17 -0800 Organization: Newt Software Message-ID: <25780.1143047657@olgas.newt.com> References: <11716.1142652302@olgas.newt.com> <15928.1142811370@olgas.newt.com> <27064.1142987375@olgas.newt.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143047718 8575 80.91.229.2 (22 Mar 2006 17:15:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+m10895@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Mar 22 18:15:16 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FM6uw-000893-66 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:14:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FM6uq-0000z3-00; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:14:36 -0600 Original-Received: from nas02.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.40]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1FM6ud-0000yC-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:14:24 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by nas02.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FM6ua-0006vR-Mg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:14:23 -0600 Original-Received: from pop-scotia.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.65]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FM6uZ-0007CA-00 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:14:19 +0100 Original-Received: from h-68-166-37-206.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net ([68.166.37.206] helo=olgas.newt.com) by pop-scotia.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1FM6uY-0004DW-00; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:14:18 -0500 Original-Received: by olgas.newt.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7F4FC16FE8; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:14:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from olgas.newt.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olgas.newt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DD516FB0; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:14:17 -0800 (PST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org, mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org, mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-reply-to: Comments: In-reply-to Reiner Steib message dated "Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:50:30 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 7.93+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50.19 X-Image-URL: http://www.newt.com/wohler/images/bill-diving.png X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:62368 gmane.mail.mh-e.devel:12029 Archived-At: --=-=-= Reiner Steib wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22 2006, Bill Wohler wrote: > > > Hmmm, the separator in the GNOME tool bars looks a lot better. I > > modified your separator to look more like the GNOME separator. Do you > > mind if I check in my version of separator.xpm? > > No. But maybe you could post your separator.xpm, so I can see how it > looks like in Gnus. --=-=-= Content-Type: image/x-xpmi Content-Disposition: inline; filename=separator.xpm Content-Description: Separator /* XPM */ static char * separator_xpm[] = { "2 24 3 1", " c None", ". c #DBD3CB", "+ c #FCFBFA", " ", " ", " ", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", ".+", " ", " ", " "}; --=-=-= > BTW, on your screen shot[1], I looks like you didn't set ":enable > nil": Right. Check out mh-tool-bar.el. I had added "nil" to its mh-tool-bar-define entry, but it didn't seem to take. I've asked Satyaki if he could take a look into it. > [1] Wouldn't PNG be more suitable than JPEG for posting small screen shots? Probably. It's just habit. If I knew that PNG was less lossy, more compressed, and could be read by *all* systems, I'd probably use it more, but I haven't read such an analysis yet. Do you know how it fares against JPG? PNG *is* a compressed, lossy format, isn't it? Or is it not lossy and better to compare against GIF? I do know that IE has some problems with transparent PNGs. -- Bill Wohler http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. --=-=-=--