From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36565
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: greg@visiontech-dml.com
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: html completely crashes gnus and emacs ... what the...
Date: 04 Jun 2001 10:15:17 +0300
Message-ID: <2faae3ou35m.fsf@broadcom.com>
References: <m1r8x34tye.fsf@reader.newsguy.com> <2favgmd98kc.fsf@broadcom.com>
	<87lmn9xsp1.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172129 9238 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:48:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:48:49 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <Gregory.Chernov@broadcom.com>
Return-Path: <Gregory.Chernov@broadcom.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 7435 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2001 07:17:10 -0000
Original-Received: from dmz.visiontech-dml.com (199.203.103.41)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2001 07:17:10 -0000
Original-Received: from VT-6.visiontech-dml.com (vtnet.visiontech-dml.com [199.203.103.50])
	by dmz.visiontech-dml.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f547B4I02475
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:11:04 +0300 (IDT)
Original-Received: (from gchernov@localhost)
	by VT-6.visiontech-dml.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id KAA06791;
	Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:15:18 +0300 (IDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: VT-6.visiontech-dml.com: gchernov set sender to Gregory.Chernov@broadcom.com using -f
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: $BQhkYA@P?4'\HC,3\g=qvp!^Q#Ivn.L_NF="Ls3/uaDsc0wFDL1JI)b{?xaGA(zhe`y-X^
 }(/PF}^}m{.|4zv+u|%|{{^!6N-|^f2:SG#Tn0?I5@6xASR2oT
In-Reply-To: <87lmn9xsp1.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (Florian Weimer's message of "03 Jun 2001 21:35:22 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Biscayne)
Original-Lines: 16
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36565
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36565

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:

> greg@visiontech-dml.com writes:
> 
> > Attached screenshot of your problematic message in emacs-w3m.
> 
> Is ding now a binaries mailing list?  I hope not.  (If you encoded the
> screenshot in the compressed PNG, it would have been much smaller, but
> over 200K in a single message is too much for this mailing list IMHO.)


Sorry, :-(
It will never happen again.
I read ding as newsgroup on quimby and always work online,
so i somehow started to forget that 200K it's to much
for mailing list.