From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74907 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Riley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: bogus group Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:51:14 +0100 Organization: aich tea tea pea dicky riley dot net Message-ID: <2h8vzv6hzx.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> References: <87wrnivqgh.fsf@dod.no> <2fbp4uj2qb.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <4hipz135vr.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87bp4tzgdp.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <2hbp4tqpfu.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <8739q5z4fe.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87y67xxlpe.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <871v5om0yb.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292107935 24559 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2010 22:52:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:52:15 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23263@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Dec 11 23:52:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRYIP-0007Tr-Hv for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:52:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PRYHi-0004oQ-Ln; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:51:22 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PRYHf-0004oC-SV for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:51:19 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PRYHe-0007Fv-83 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:51:19 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PRYHd-0003nE-00 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:51:17 +0100 Original-Received: by eyz10 with SMTP id 10so3087435eyz.7 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:51:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:organization :references:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DbC+OJN4eysBSFGwrFsq/UxctiHvxzBNu8gnKLUkr3s=; b=oBgOQHrO46iI1lwsManntoyw/gzmdPXzW5w921XWwh3weKgYvG5an7/eX46Q5YLwua 9VTjsl+5HdOYwf66ke/hoWIxGDS289VuX5N9DFHiNrvt9ruf3YlhF9dBM3V02yuDBvgW SJCCN+de3LFG/1CWc0ZeKBUX10CwBmF7AZOO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:organization:references:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fdf1R8snsk1FkSmz/Dqps1LZ7C6YVV1oxBAI52XgN2FwoQNnfvKaClHxFMrxIHMxm1 4d0oQ6suMWuD2ouDF8/MQiFRqOEq+s5IY4dbIIr8tn8bOc/d5ZsAe3Fo080o239Z2/ld nGMxN2XGRDV92UilsLrRI6+AFbiLZgWmhchJo= Original-Received: by 10.213.104.134 with SMTP id p6mr900351ebo.82.1292107877021; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:51:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([85.183.18.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q58sm3656068eeh.21.2010.12.11.14.51.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:51:16 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74907 Archived-At: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sj=C3=B8gren) writes: > On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:17:53 +0100, Richard wrote: > >> I tried this and I still get all incoming system mail into "bogus". > >> (setq nnmail-split-fancy '(|(: spam-split) "inbox")) >> (setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy) > > Did using the imap-specific variant of the variables make any > difference? > > Best regards, > > Adam This is to do with nnml - nothing to do with imap. Or am I missing something? Just to reiterate: this is only about my "local system mail". It has me totally and utterly confused. Any mail to root@local host I have aliased to rgr@localhost. This ends up in ~/Mail. The default nnml back end seems to know about this. I dont know how or why but my select method is simply:- (setq gnus-select-method '(nnml "nnml")) I sent root a mail and it ended up in Gnus-Spam on nnml backend. I then reverted to (setq nnmail-split-fancy '("inbox") ; I suspect this is wrong for a start. and it ended up in bogus again. As I said, I'm a bit blind to it all now and cant see the wood for the trees is anymore as I dont understand how nnmail vars and nnml are related. Anyone?