From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37421
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: MML multipart tag -- what does it do?
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 11:16:48 -0700
Message-ID: <2n1ymtf1pr.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
References: <vafwv4lt7nw.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<ilur8utavwq.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172840 13797 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:00:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:00:40 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Return-Path: <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 23926 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2001 18:19:36 -0000
Original-Received: from unknown (HELO zsh.2y.net) (131.241.79.83)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2001 18:19:36 -0000
Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost)
	by zsh.2y.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f73IGn621104;
	Fri, 3 Aug 2001 11:16:49 -0700
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Attribution: ZSH
X-Face: 'IF:e51ib'Qbl^(}l^&4-J`'P!@[4~O|&k#:@Gld#b/]oMq&`&FVY._3+b`mzp~Jeve~/#/
 ERD!OTe<86UhyN=l`mrPY)M7_}`Ktt\K+58Z!hu7>qU,i.N7TotU[FYE(f1;}`g2xj!u*l`^&=Q!g{
 *q|<EDbQtg9{wfQuI,#r#{'A,\!95my:/,]"s,O4nzqxNL.}WrHA>ddto|nkt"$r,K$[)"|6,elPH=
 GJ6Q
In-Reply-To: <ilur8utavwq.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's
 message of "Fri, 03 Aug 2001 19:35:49 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.105
Original-Lines: 23
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37421
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37421

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:


[...]

> All the MML commands ends when a new command of the same type is
> inserted, I think.  There's no need for </part> or </multipart>.
> Maybe someone could try to come up with a counter-example..

It is right for </part>, not for </multipart>.  The following example
is reasonable.

<multipart>
<multipart>
</multipart>
<multipart>
</multipart>
</multipart>

For this reason, the <mml> tag is invented to markup message/rfc822
parts.  It is similar to <part>, but need for </mml>.

ShengHuo