From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36824 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ShengHuo ZHU Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: smtpmail and gnus-agentize Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 17:25:40 -0700 Message-ID: <2n1ynp4ol7.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172346 10661 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:52:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 12918 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2001 00:28:14 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO zsh.2y.net) (131.241.79.242) by gnus.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2001 00:28:14 -0000 Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost) by zsh.2y.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f6A0Pe512428; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:25:40 -0700 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: ZSH X-Face: 'IF:e51ib'Qbl^(}l^&4-J`'P!@[4~O|&k#:@Gld#b/]oMq&`&FVY._3+b`mzp~Jeve~/#/ ERD!OTe<86UhyN=l`mrPY)M7_}`Ktt\K+58Z!hu7>qU,i.N7TotU[FYE(f1;}`g2xj!u*l`^&=Q!g{ *q|ddto|nkt"$r,K$[)"|6,elPH= GJ6Q In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Mon, 09 Jul 2001 22:17:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104 Original-Lines: 23 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36824 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36824 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > I guess many people might have the following two lines in their > ~/.gnus, amongst others: > > (setq message-send-mail-function 'smtpmail-sent-it) > (gnus-agentize) > > Of course, the second line changes message-send-mail-function to the > one used by the agent. > > And then, people start Gnus again, and then ~/.gnus is read again, and > then the setq is evaled again, but (gnus-agentize) does not change > message-send-mail-function again! > > Maybe this is not a bug, but surely it's counter-intuitive. Do you > think it should be changed? Since message-send-mail-function is a customizable function, we'd better not change it. Now, message-send-mail-real-function is added for internal use. ShengHuo