Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Subject: Re: Yike whats this [Undownloaded article 9563] 180 of them
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 10:23:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2naduy4hzc.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1wuy2zfxq.fsf@reader.newsguy.com> (Harry Putnam's message of "Mon, 28 Jan 2002 06:52:01 -0800")

Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:

> I just saw something I never saw before in my comp.lang.perl.moderated
> group. This group is under agent control, and I just cvs'ed yesterday.
>
> I happened to open it with a C-u <RET> and I found 189 messages that
> say:
> [...]
>  1@  31-Dec [   0: Gnus Agent          ] [Undownloaded article 9561]
>  1@  31-Dec [   0: Gnus Agent          ] [Undownloaded article 9562]
>  1@  31-Dec [   0: Gnus Agent          ] [Undownloaded article 9563]
> [...]
>
> Note the old date.  And I've never seen this notation in a summary
> buffer before. Gnus Agent listing out undownloaded articles like that.

Gnus Agent knows nothing about these articles, but these articles
possibly exist on the server. Therefore, nnagent inserts such bogus
lines.  The date means nothing.

> The very odd thing is that this group was begun fresh Jan 9 and has a
> predicate of `true'.  There should be no undownloaded articles.
> Further these file numbers do not in fact exist.  Also, they are not
> known to the .overview file, ditto .agentview.  Nor do they exit in
> .newsrc.eld.  Agent.lib/history doesn't know about them either.

If you see those articles in plugged mode, but see such lines when you
reenter the group in unplugged mode, then it is a bug in Gnus Agent.

> However I did find a huge list in agent.lib/history about a different
> group that looks like:
>
> [...]
> No-Message-ID-in-article	730859	alt.solaris.x86 59576 
> No-Message-ID-in-article	730859	alt.solaris.x86 59577 
> No-Message-ID-in-article	730859	alt.solaris.x86 59578 
> [...]
>
> Why are article numbers differernt than file names there? And is it
> likely there really weren't message ids in hundreds of messages.

File names? The second numbers are article numbers, i.e. file
names. Could you check whether the articles really have no
Message-ID's?

ShengHuo



  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-28 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-28 14:52 Harry Putnam
2002-01-28 15:23 ` ShengHuo ZHU [this message]
2002-01-28 16:42   ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-28 16:59     ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-28 18:45     ` ShengHuo ZHU
2002-01-28 16:48   ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-28 16:25 ` Harry Putnam
2002-01-28 18:20   ` ShengHuo ZHU
2002-01-28 19:21 ` Henrik Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2naduy4hzc.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu \
    --to=zsh@cs.rochester.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).