From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37052
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: gnus-message-archive-method is confusing
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:04:53 -0700
Message-ID: <2ng0bmlv5m.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
References: <vafwv6gbwp2.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3wv534cqc.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<vafofqennmz.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172536 11859 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:55:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:55:36 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Return-Path: <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 4374 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2001 06:07:35 -0000
Original-Received: from c1778337-a.stcla1.sfba.home.com (HELO zsh.2y.net) (65.12.48.218)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2001 06:07:35 -0000
Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost)
	by zsh.2y.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f6O64rn19963;
	Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:04:53 -0700
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Attribution: ZSH
X-Face: 'IF:e51ib'Qbl^(}l^&4-J`'P!@[4~O|&k#:@Gld#b/]oMq&`&FVY._3+b`mzp~Jeve~/#/
 ERD!OTe<86UhyN=l`mrPY)M7_}`Ktt\K+58Z!hu7>qU,i.N7TotU[FYE(f1;}`g2xj!u*l`^&=Q!g{
 *q|<EDbQtg9{wfQuI,#r#{'A,\!95my:/,]"s,O4nzqxNL.}WrHA>ddto|nkt"$r,K$[)"|6,elPH=
 GJ6Q
In-Reply-To: <vafofqennmz.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
 (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Sat, 21 Jul 2001
 20:27:32 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.104
Original-Lines: 32
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37052
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37052

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Paul Jarc wrote:
> 
>> How does gnus-outgoing-message-group relate to all this?  Is it
>> obsoleted by g-m-a-g?  Or used for something slightly different?
> 
> If I remember correctly, I had an exchange like this with Lars:
> 
> Me: So, what's the difference between gnus-outgoing-message-group and
> gnus-message-archive-group?
> 
> Lars: The former is older.
> 
> Me: So, is gnus-outgoing-message-group going to go away?
> 
> Lars: No.
> 
> I'm not sure what to make of this...  IMVHO the two ways are not
> needed.  But on the other hand it seems that using
> gnus-message-archive-group means that the Gcc header is not inserted
> in all cases.  Hm.  Ah, yes, maybe it has to do with the gcc-self
> group parameter.  Yeah, I think with gnus-outgoing-message-group and
> the gcc-self parameter you get two Gcc headers, but with
> gnus-message-archive-group and the gcc-self parameter you get only one
> (the gcc-self one).
> 
> Can anyone confirm this?

By reading the code, I think you are right.

ShengHuo