* broken "[Bb]oundary=" recognition?
@ 2001-07-27 13:46 Karl Kleinpaste
2001-07-27 17:11 ` ShengHuo ZHU
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Karl Kleinpaste @ 2001-07-27 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
There is an article, news:9jrinq0dcf@enews4.newsguy.com, which
purports to be:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
Boundary=----=DD12CF7A829611D599AF00104B9FF285
containing text/plain and text/html -- pretty typical. Yet it displays
as though it were all text/plain, with all the internal MIME headers
visible. I'm wondering whether Gnus is failing to notice a valid
"boundary=" due to the word being capitalized in the message header.
Is it legitimate for "Boundary=" to be capitalized? I'd like to think
MIME keywords are supposed to be considered case-insensitively.
FTR, running Oort CVS-updated as of 5 minutes ago.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: broken "[Bb]oundary=" recognition?
2001-07-27 13:46 broken "[Bb]oundary=" recognition? Karl Kleinpaste
@ 2001-07-27 17:11 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2001-08-17 21:14 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: ShengHuo ZHU @ 2001-07-27 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
Karl Kleinpaste <karl@charcoal.com> writes:
> There is an article, news:9jrinq0dcf@enews4.newsguy.com, which
> purports to be:
>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> Boundary=----=DD12CF7A829611D599AF00104B9FF285
>
> containing text/plain and text/html -- pretty typical. Yet it displays
> as though it were all text/plain, with all the internal MIME headers
> visible. I'm wondering whether Gnus is failing to notice a valid
> "boundary=" due to the word being capitalized in the message header.
>
> Is it legitimate for "Boundary=" to be capitalized? I'd like to think
> MIME keywords are supposed to be considered case-insensitively.
It is not legitimate, not because of the capitalized Boundary, but
because the boundary value contains special character =. It should be
a quoted-string.
ShengHuo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: broken "[Bb]oundary=" recognition?
2001-07-27 17:11 ` ShengHuo ZHU
@ 2001-08-17 21:14 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2001-08-17 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu> writes:
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> Boundary=----=DD12CF7A829611D599AF00104B9FF285
[...]
> It is not legitimate, not because of the capitalized Boundary, but
> because the boundary value contains special character =. It should be
> a quoted-string.
This is probably the most common way MIME handling "breaks" for Gnus
-- somebody uses a "=" character in a non-quoted separator.
Should we try to parse these invalid messages, or should we just let
the user intervene manually with `K m' to repair the message?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-08-17 21:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-07-27 13:46 broken "[Bb]oundary=" recognition? Karl Kleinpaste
2001-07-27 17:11 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2001-08-17 21:14 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).