From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38825
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: announce: nnmaildir 2001.09.11
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:07:35 -0400
Message-ID: <2nitefri88.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
References: <m3d74yb8ze.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<hhofo83ne1.fsf@nightshade.la.mastaler.com>
	<m3u1y05yqj.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> <2nlmjctpol.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
	<m3adzs5pm3.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
	<iluzo7s8gk6.fsf@barbar.josefsson.org>
	<2nzo7srzr7.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet>
	<zo7sfb7i.fsf@hschmi22.userfqdn.rz-online.de>
	<plop87bsk8b0xr.fsf@linuxfr.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174629 24608 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:30:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:30:29 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Return-Path: <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 23432 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2001 03:07:55 -0000
Original-Received: from roc-24-95-193-9.rochester.rr.com (HELO zsh.2y.net) (@24.95.193.9)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Sep 2001 03:07:55 -0000
Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost)
	by zsh.2y.net (8.11.6/8.11.2) id f8J37ZK01523;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:07:35 -0400
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Attribution: ZSH
X-Face: 'IF:e51ib'Qbl^(}l^&4-J`'P!@[4~O|&k#:@Gld#b/]oMq&`&FVY._3+b`mzp~Jeve~/#/
 ERD!OTe<86UhyN=l`mrPY)M7_}`Ktt\K+58Z!hu7>qU,i.N7TotU[FYE(f1;}`g2xj!u*l`^&=Q!g{
 *q|<EDbQtg9{wfQuI,#r#{'A,\!95my:/,]"s,O4nzqxNL.}WrHA>ddto|nkt"$r,K$[)"|6,elPH=
 GJ6Q
Mail-Copies-To: never
In-Reply-To: <plop87bsk8b0xr.fsf@linuxfr.org> (Fabien Penso's message of
 "Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:15:28 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.106
Original-Lines: 16
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38825
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38825

Fabien Penso <penso@linuxfr.org> writes:

[...]

> And will the anonymous CVS access for Gnus be removed ? I mean as there
> is no emacs21 anonymous access yet, will the rule apply to Gnus also ?

I don't think this rule will apply to Gnus.

> Does that also mean than anyone which send patchs will have to sign
> something and return it to FSF to say they give up their copyright ?
> (well I don't think I'll ever be concerned about it, but who knows...)

For non-trivial patches, yes.

ShengHuo