From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32077 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ShengHuo ZHU Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Shouldn't Gnus (er, W3) inline related images in ? Date: 11 Aug 2000 17:41:10 -0400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <2nlmy3jx1l.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> References: <87n1moph1r.fsf@mharnois.workgroup.net> <87ya672i8q.fsf@mharnois.workgroup.net> <87bt30n4sf.fsf@mharnois.workgroup.net> <87hf8tc5hx.fsf@cachemir.echo-net.net> <87og303647.fsf@worldonline.dk> <2ng0ocmn6o.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> <2nya23kixe.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168409 17719 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:46:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C342ED051E for ; Sat, 12 Aug 2000 09:55:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAC01845; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:18:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:17:50 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16239 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:17:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from shenghuo.dhs.org (d18182975.rochester.rr.com [24.24.41.117]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA753D051E for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:18:07 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost) by shenghuo.dhs.org (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e7BLfAb20261; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 17:41:10 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: ZSH X-Face: 'IF:e51ib'Qbl^(}l^&4-J`'P!@[4~O|&k#:@Gld#b/]oMq&`&FVY._3+b`mzp~Jeve~/#/ ERD!OTe<86UhyN=l`mrPY)M7_}`Ktt\K+58Z!hu7>qU,i.N7TotU[FYE(f1;}`g2xj!u*l`^&=Q!g{ *q|ddto|nkt"$r,K$[)"|6,elPH= GJ6Q In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "11 Aug 2000 23:03:06 +0200" Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32077 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32077 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > On 11 Aug 2000, ShengHuo ZHU wrote: > > > Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > > > >> Or maybe Gnus does use the first matching entry it finds, but > >> searches from the end of the list, rather than from the beginning? > > > > mailcap-mime-data is stored in the last-entry-first order. > Oh. Does that mean that /etc/mailcap entries will always override > ~/.mailcap entries? IMVHO, it should be vice-versa. Oops. I was wrong. It should be last-parsed-file-first. The parsing order is "/usr/local/etc/mailcap" "/usr/etc/mailcap" "/etc/mailcap" "~/.mailcap", i.e. ~/.mailcap entries override /etc/mailcap ones. But the best viewer is selected according to mailcap-viewer-lessp. ShengHuo