From: ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu>
Cc: cc@cli.de, bugs@gnus.org (The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys)
Subject: Re: No bug, just a hint to GKNSA
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:14:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2nr8ua9vvg.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m31ymcbjth.fsf@gmx.de> (Christoph Conrad's message of "Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:27:54 +0200")
Christoph Conrad <christoph.conrad@gmx.de> writes:
> I would like to give a pointer to
>
> <http://www.xs4all.nl/~js/gnksa>
>
> ,----
> | A few years ago, Ron Newman wrote a document intended to describe
> | minimal standards for decent net-behaviour, in an effort to
> | encourage newsreader authors to write better behaving newsreaders.
> | Thus came the Good Net-Keeping Seal of Approval, GNKSA 1.2 in
> | short, into being.
> |
> | Things changed rapidly, however: a vast army of new users stormed
> | the Internet and Usenet, often using new generations of tools that
> | displayed forms of bad behaviour unimagined before. This called
> | for a serious effort to bring the GNKSA up to date; for that
> | reason, I, Jeroen Scheerder, took the liberty to undertake the
> | venture of revamping GNKSA.
> |
> | After I asked him, Ron kindly handed the GNKSA off to me. The
> | result of all this: GNKSA 2.0. For brevity's sake I will omit
> | version numbering whenever possible without causing confusion.
> `----
>
> Maybe it helps to lift Gnus to 100% fulfilling the criterias (if you
> agree with them, of course...)
>
> Gnus 5.8 rated at 95% with failing two MUSTS.
>
> <http://www.xs4all.nl/~js/gnksa/Evaluations/gnus-5.8.txt>
,----
| Regarding the strict GNKSA requirements (MUSTs), Gnus 5.8
| FAILS on the following points:
|
| 11b Will not refuse to post articles without subject
| 12b Fails to refuse to post messages with syntactically incorrect From:
|
| Gnus 5.8 violates `soft' GNKSA requirements (SHOULDs)
| in the following way:
|
| 3c Fails to encourage setting a Followup-To on large crossposts
| 7e Fails to omit `broken' Message-IDs.
| 16b Does not refuse posting an empty article
| 16d Does not refuse to post quoted text only
| 16f Does not try to prevent posting multiple copies entirely
`----
I don't think 11b, 12b, 3c, and 7e are issues in 5.8. At least in
<http://www.xs4all.nl/~js/gnksa/Evaluations/gnus-5.070044.txt>, they
don't fail. And 16b, 16d and 16f have been fixed in oGnus.
Thoughts?
ShengHuo
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-17 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <m31ymcbjth.fsf@gmx.de>
2001-08-17 22:14 ` ShengHuo ZHU [this message]
[not found] ` <9lk53t$5d$1@quimby.gnus.org>
2001-08-17 22:33 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-18 4:38 ` ShengHuo ZHU
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2nr8ua9vvg.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet \
--to=zsh@cs.rochester.edu \
--cc=bugs@gnus.org \
--cc=cc@cli.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).