From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26459 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Shenghuo ZHU Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Postfix or Gnus problem in to: header? Date: 09 Nov 1999 01:05:05 -0500 Organization: U of Rochester Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <2nr9i0w67i.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> References: <87ln88p72n.fsf@iname.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163664 19494 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:27:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA13610 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 01:06:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAB30361; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 00:06:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:07:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA21260 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 00:06:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from cayuga.cs.rochester.edu (cayuga.cs.rochester.edu [192.5.53.209]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA13605 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 01:06:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from heart.cs.rochester.edu (heart.cs.rochester.edu [192.5.53.109]) by cayuga.cs.rochester.edu (8.9.3/Q) with ESMTP id BAA22990 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 01:06:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from zsh@localhost) by heart.cs.rochester.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA03988; Tue, 9 Nov 1999 01:05:05 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: ZSH X-Face: 'IF:e51ib'Qbl^(}l^&4-J`'P!@[4~O|&k#:@Gld#b/]oMq&`&FVY._3+b`mzp~Jeve~/#/ ERD!OTe<86UhyN=l`mrPY)M7_}`Ktt\K+58Z!hu7>qU,i.N7TotU[FYE(f1;}`g2xj!u*l`^&=Q!g{ *q|ddto|nkt"$r,K$[)"|6,elPH= GJ6Q In-Reply-To: David Maslen's message of "09 Nov 1999 16:28:16 +1100" Original-Lines: 33 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070099 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.99) XEmacs/21.2 (Shinjuku) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26459 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26459 >>>>> "David" == David Maslen writes: David> I had a bounced message when trying to reply to a message with the David> following headers; David> Gcc: nnfolder:outgoing David> To: "Wang, John" David> Subject: Re: How can I register My Star office 5.1 David> References: David> From: David Maslen David> Date: 09 Nov 1999 16:22:17 +1100 David> In-Reply-To: "Wang, John"'s message of "Tue, 9 Nov 1999 07:31:43 +1100" David> Message-ID: <87puxkp7cm.fsf@iname.com> David> --text follows this line-- David> Postfix tried to expand the "Wang, John" to Wang@$mydomain. Since David> there is no user wang at my domain it bounced. I notice Kai used () David> instead of <> around his email address. This also causes me to get a David> bounced message if I just hit reply. David> So should the mail client feed the mail server a message with David> the to: header in the correct format? Is there a correct format David> (bet there is), and assuming the problem originates with "Wang, David> John", where should the compromise come from so that the system David> works. Gnus or Postfix. I think we can assume it's impractical David> to have all end users do the right thing. I am not sure what Postfix does. But there is a bug about the quoted comma in in XEmacs mail-lib (less than 1.24). So try again after removing the comma in the "To:" field. -- Shenghuo